The Relationship between Understanding, Language, ‎and Metaphor in Gadamer's Thought

Document Type : Original Article

Author

Assistant Professor, Department of Philosophy and Islamic Wisdom, Faculty of ‎Theology and Islamic Studies, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Iran. ‎

Abstract

In his ontological exposition of understanding, Gadamer, by raising the issue of dialogue between the interpreter and the text, paved the way for discussing challenging topics such as relativism in knowledge. In his view, the fusion of the temporal-linguistic horizons of the interpreter and the text explains the possibility of multiplicity of meaning and the endlessness of understanding. In this article, we attempt to examine the possibility of the metaphorical nature of understanding from a different perspective, namely by focusing on the discussion of "metaphor," due to its importance in providing reasons for the possibility of diversity and invention of meaning in language. Although the theory of metaphor is a core discussion in Ricoeur's philosophy, and Gadamer has not extensively addressed the topic of metaphor except for some allusions in explaining language; nevertheless, some commentators have re-examined understanding and the fusion of horizons by resorting to this theory. Therefore, while analyzing these interpretations using a descriptive-analytical method, and based on the relationship between unity and tension between identity and difference in the structure of metaphor, we substantiate the metaphorical characteristic of understanding, language, and the fusion of horizons, and its hermeneutic consequences.

Keywords

References

Dostal, R. J. (2002). The Cambridge Companion to Gadamer. New York: Cambridge Publishment Company.
Gadamer, H. G. (1977). Philosophical Hermeneutics (D. E. Linge, Trans & Ed.). London: University of California Press.
Gadamer, H. G. (1989). Truth and method (2nd rev. ed., J. Weinsheimer & D. G. Marshall, Trans.). New York, NY: Crossroad.
Grondin, J. (1994). Introduction to Philosophical Hermeneutics. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Novakovic, A. (2004). Uncovering the Condition for Understanding Another (first reader: Kathleen Wright, second reader: Robert Dostal, Azade Seyhan). Senior Seminar. Haverford College, Haverford, PA.
Ricoeur, P. (1977). The Rule of Metaphor (R. Czerny. Trans.). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Ricoeur, P. (1981 b). Hermeneutics and the Human Sciences (J. B. Thompson, Trans & Ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Ricoeur, P. (1988). Time and Narrative (K. Blamey & D. Pellauer, Trans., Vol. 3). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Ricoeur, P. (2006). On Translation (E. Brennan, Trans.). London: Routledge.
Taylor, C. (2002). Understanding the other: A Gadamerian View on Conceptual Schemes (J. Malpas & U, Arnswald & J. Kertscher, Eds.). In Gadamer’s Century: Essays in Honor of Hans Georg Gadamer. London: The MIT Press.
Taylor, G. H. (2011). Understanding as Metaphoric, Not a Fusion of Horizons (F. J. Mootz III & G. H. Taylor, Eds.). In Gadamer and Ricoeur. New York: Continuum.
Warnke, G. (1994). Hermeneutics, Tradition and Reason. London: Polity Press.
Weinsheimer, J. (1991). Philosophical Hermeneutics and Literary Theory. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Weinsheimer, J. (2002). Philosophical Hermeneutics and Literary Theory (M. Alia, Trans.). Tehran: Qoqnoos Publications (Original: Weinsheimer, J (1991). Philosophical Hermeneutics and Literary Theory. New Haven: Yale University Press). [In Persian]
Theosophia Islamica
Volume 5, Issue 2 - Serial Number 10
November 2025
Pages 207-236

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics