The Analysis and Critique of Cognitive Rationality from Rescher’s Viewpoint

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Associate Professor in Department of Islamic Philosophy and Theology, Faculty of Theology, Qom University, Qom, Iran

2 Graduate in Comparative Philosophy, Qom University, Qom, Iran

Abstract

In Rescher’s view, the cognitive rationality is using dialectic arguments for managing the acceptance of various beliefs and answering the individual’s questions in the best way – an approach that can entail access to rational propositions and true knowledge. While believing in the limitation of rational faculties, Rescher maintains that the intelligence endowed in human being in an evolutional way prepares the ground for his access to the authentic knowledge. The cognitive importance of the criterion of investigating the value of knowledge suggests the existence of an effective factor that can help us in qualitative and quantitative promotion of and deepening our essential information. Skepticism rejects the possibility of accessing authentic information and puts a seemingly strong obstacle on the way to implementing and realizing the goals of argument, and maintains that cognitive rationality is never possible. Rescher considers justification of skepticism based on the wrong assumption that the rational justification of a belief is restricted to the deductive reasoning founded on pre-justified propositions. However, in addition to this, we have the method of hypothetical justification that skeptics ignore.

Keywords

References

  1. Amanda G. D. (2015). Scientific Prediction in Nicholas Rescher’s Conception: Philosophico-Methodological Analysis. Universidade Da Coruna.
  2. (1924). Metaphysics (Trans. Sharaf Khorasani, Sh., 5th ed). Tehran: Hekmat Publications.
  3. Bahman-pur, M. S. (1379 SH). Farāz wa Nashīb ‘Aqlānoyyat, 1st, Qom: Navader Publications.
  4. Fumerton, R. (2006). Epistemology (Trans: Peykani, J., 2nd). Tehran: Hekmat Publications. https://doi.org/ 10.2307/ 2108502.
  5. James, W. (1979). The will to believe and other essays in popular philosophy 6), Harvard University Press.
  6. Kekes, J. (1994). Rescher on Rationality and Morality. [Review of a System of Pragmatic Idealism. Volume II. The Validity of Value]. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 54(2), pp. 415–420.
  7. Moutafakis, N. J. (2007). Rescher on Rationality, Values and Social A Philosophical Portrait. vol. 1, https://www.ontosverlag.com.
  8. Pollock, J. and Cruz, J. (1999). Contemporary Theories of Knowledge (Studies in Epistemology and Cognitive Theory) (Trans: Haqqi, A., 1st). Qom: Bustan Ketab.
  9. Rabi‘-nia, M. A. (1394 SH). “‘Aqlāniyyat Hadaf-Wasīla, Chārchūbī barāyi ‘Aqlāniyyat ‘Ilm” in Falsafayi ‘Im Journal, 2, pp. 21-37. Research Center of Humanities and Cultural Studies.
  10. Rescher, N. (1977). Methodological Pragmatism. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
  11. Rescher, N. (1988). Rationality, A Philosophical Inquiry into the Nature and Rationale of Reason. United States: Oxford (Clarendon Press).
  12. Rescher, N. (2001). Is Reasoning about Values Viciously Circular?. In: The Journal of Value Inquiry, no. 35, pp. 5-12.
  13. Rescher, N. (2005). Pragmatism at the crossroads. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society. (Indiana University Press), vol. 41, Issue 2.
  14. Rescher, N. (2006). Rationality, Optimalism the Rationality of the Real: on the Prospects of AX. The View of Metaphysics, 59, 3; pp. 5-12, pp. 503-518.
  15. Rescher, N. (2017). Value Reasoning on the Pragmatic Rationality of Evaluation. ISBN 978-3-319-54139-6 (eBook)
  16. Sankey, H., Cockburn, D., and Bowker, G. (1994). A Dialogue on Rationality, Social Sphere and Realism (Trans: Foturchi, P.) In: Dhihn Journal, 17, pp. 101-132.
  17. Siegel, H. (1992). Rescher on the Justification of Rationality. In:Informal Logic, 14(1).
  18. Yoon, Y. (2020). A Picture of a cat against Cholera? Rationality in History as Seen from a Universalist Perspective

.https://www.tandfonline.com7/loi/tsep20.

Theosophia Islamica
Volume 2, Issue 2
August 2022
Pages 136-167

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics