The Metaphysical Distinction between Existence and Essence: A Foundation for the Non-Greek Philosophical System

Document Type : Original Article

Author

department of Islamic philosophy, faculty of theology, azarbaijan shahid madani university, Tabriz, Iran

Abstract

With a rational reflection on possible beings, Farabi presents an analysis of the relationship between existence and essence, which requires a new philosophical system distinct from Greek philosophy. In his view, all possible beings are composed of two metaphysical aspects, i.e. existence and essence. By distinguishing constituents (muqawwamāt) from accidental things (‘araḍiyyāt) and using terms such as ‘āriḍ and lāzim, Farabi explores the structure of possible beings. In possible beings, existence is not the same or a part of essence; rather, it is an accident of essence, and since any accidental thing is subject to causality (mu‘allal), thus the possible things require something out of themselves for their existence. The main point is that the container of this distinction is not merely the world of the mind or the objective world; rather, it is the product of rational analysis. In other words, the distinction of existence and essence is neither a mental distinction nor a physical one; rather, it is a rational distinction which is called, in today’s metaphysics, metaphysical distinction. In metaphysical distinction, the existence and essence of the possible beings are two ontological principles and two metaphysical modes of the being that compose its identity. The metaphysical distinction designs the foundation of the non-Greek philosophical system based on which one can explain, from the theological viewpoint, proving the existence of the Necessary Being, the evolution of the ultimate causality, natural agency with the agentive causality and divine agency; from the cosmological viewpoint, proving the essential contingency of the universe and the philosophical explanation of the creation; from the ontological viewpoint, dividing beings into necessary and possible, and explaining the structure of possible beings; and from the epistemological viewpoint, evolution in dividing knowledge. This article is an applied study that attempts, by relying on the descriptive-analytical method with an exploration of the metaphysical distinction between existence and essence, to deal with applying that distinction in Farabi’s philosophical system and its products and results.

Keywords

References

  1. Avicenna (1405). Al-Ilāhiyāt al-Shifā (ed. Qanavati, A. and Zaʾid, S.). Qom: Ayatollah Mar‘ashi Najafi Library.
  2. Plotinus (1366 SH). Collection of Works (Trans. Kharazmi, M. H., 1st ed). Tehran: Kharazmi.
  3. Akbarian, R. and Haghighat, S. (1387 SH). “Rābiṭayi Wujūd wa Māhiyat dar Falsafayi Arastū wa Ibn Sīnā” in Khiradnamayi Ṣadrā, 52, pp.
    40-61.
  4. Toshihiko, I. (1969). The Fundamental Structure of Sabzawari's Metaphysics (Trans. Mujtabavi, J., 3rd ed). Tehran: Tehran University.
  5. Pur-Hassan, Q. (1393 SH). “Fārābī wa Naẓariyayi Tamāyuz Wujūd az Māhyat” in Tārikh Falsafa, 5(19), pp/ 63-90.
  6. Haghighat, S. (1401 AH). “Barrasī Intiqādī Dīdgāh Suhravardī darbārayi Wujūd” in Pazhūhishhāyi Hastīshinākhtī biquarterly, Vol. 21, pp. 343-370.
  7. Suhrawardi, Sh. (1380 SH). Majmū‘a Muṣannafāt (Vol. 2, 3rd ,ed. and intro. Henry Corbin). Tehran: Research Center of Humanities and Cultural Studies.
  8. Sadruddin Shirazi, M. I. (1410 AH). Al-Ḥikmat al-Muta‘āliya fil-Asfār al-‘Aqliya al-Arba‘a (vol. 1). Beirut: Dar al-Ihya al-Turath al-‘
  9. Tabatabaʾi, S. M. H. (1362 SH). Nihāya al-Ḥikma (1st). Qom: Nashr al-Islamiya Institute.
  10. Farabi, A. M. T. (1890). Uyūn al-Masāʾil in al-Maḍiya fī Ba‘ḍ al-Risālāt al-Fārābiyya. Leiden: Friedrich Ditrisi.
  11. Farabi, A. M. T. (1349 AH). Al-Da‘āwī al-Qalbiyya in Rasāʾil Abī Naṣr Fārābī. Heidarabad: Daʾirat al-Ma‘arif al-Uthmani al-Kaʾina.
  12. Farabi, A. M. T. (1349 AH). Sharḥ Risāla Zeynūn alKabīr al-Yūnānī in Rasāʾil Abī Naṣr Fārābī. Heidarabad: Daʾirat al-Ma‘arif al-Uthmani al-Kaʾina.
  13. Farabi, A. M. T. (1371 SH). Al-Ta‘līqāt (ed. Ja‘far Al Yasin). Tehran: Hikmat Publications.
  14. Farabi, A. M. T. (1381 SH). Fuṣūṣ al-Ḥikma (ed. Ali Owjabi). Tehran: Soicety for Great Cultural Works.
  15. Farabi, A. M. T. (1387 SH). Collection of Farabi’s Treatises (Trans. Rahimiyan, S., 1st ed). Tehran: Ilmi wa Farhangi Publications.
  16. Farabi, A. M. T. (1404 AH). Al-Alfāẓ Musta‘mila fil-Manṭiq (ed. Mahdi, M.). Qom: al-Zahra Publications.
  17. Farabi, A. M. T. (1970). Al-Ḥurūf (ed. Mahdi, M.). Beirut: Dar al-Mashriq.
  18. Kamali-zada, T. (1387 SH). Wujūd wa Māhyat dar Niẓām Falsafī Arasṭū wa Fārābī. in Ḥikmat Sīnawī, 12(39), pp. 94-111.
  19. Hidayatafza, M. and Lawaʾi, Sh. (1395 SH). Rābiṭayi Wujūd wa Māhiyat az Manẓar Fārābī, Ibn Sīnā wa Bahmanyār. in Journal of Islamic Philosophy and Theology, 49(2), pp. 277-295.
  20. (1993). Posteriori Analytics (Trans. with a Commentary Barnes, J.), Oxford.
  21. Copleston, F. (1963). Aquinas, Maryland: Penguin Books.
  22. Corrigan, K. (1996). Essence and Existence in Enneads. in the Cambridge Companion to Plotinus: Cambridge.
  23. Glanville, J. J. (1967). Distinction, Kinds of, in New Catholic Encyclopedia, Washington, Catholic University of America, Vol. 4, pp. 408-411.
  24. Netton, I. R. (1994). Allah Transcendent, England: Curzon Press.
  25. Plotinus, (1992). The Enneads (Trans. Stephen M), Oxford University Press.
  26. Shehadi, F. (1982). Metaphysics in Islamic Philosophy, New York, Karavan Books.
  27. Taylore, J.C. (1967). Essence and Existence, in New Catholic Encyclopedia, Washington, Catholic University of America, Vol. 5, pp. 548-552.
  28. Wippel, J. (1982). The Relationship Between Essence and Existence in Late Thirteenth-century Thought: Giles of Rome, Henry of Ghent, Godfrey of Fontaines and James of Viterbo, in Philosophies of Existence: Ancient and Medieval. (ed. Parviz. M.). New York: Fordham University Press.
  29. Wippel, J. (2000). .Essence and Existence. in The Cambridge History of Later Medieval Philosophy ( Norman K., Anthony K. and Pinborg, J.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

 

 

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics