Professor of philosophy at St. Olaf College, a senior research fellow at the Institute for Faithful Research, and a member of the Royal Institute of Philosophy, Holland
Charles Taliaferro’s “Philosophy of Mind and the Christian” begins with a loaded question: “Are we thoroughly physical beings, or do we contain some nonphysical part, something we may call a soul, spirit, or mind?” The question presents us with a false dilemma, for there is also the possibility that we are neither merely material beings nor do we contain a soul as a nonphysical part of us. Taliaferro follows this with a list of other questions pertaining to the philosophy of mind and asks whether Christians should give answers to these sorts of questions that differ from non-Christian colleagues. It seems odd to divide colleagues based on Christianity with regard to these questions, for it means that if the Christian colleagues do have a particular take on these issues, it will be different from that of non-Christian theistic colleagues. Perhaps, however, Taliaferro’s department consists only of Christians and atheists. In this case, however, Taliaferro seems to think that there will be a uniformity in Christian thought that seems somewhat doubtful.
Adams, R. M. (1979). Primitive Thisness and Primitive Identity. The Journal of Philosophy, 76(1), pp. 5-26.
Baker Lynne, R. (2007). Persons and the Natural Order (P. V. Inwagen & D. Zimmerman, Eds.). Persons, Human and Divine. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Baker, L. R. (2001). Material Persons and the Doctrine of Resurrection, Faith and Philosophy 18(2), pp. 151-167.
Bloom, P. (2004). Descartes’ Baby: How the science of child development explains what makes us human. New York: Basic Books.
Hudson, H. (2007). I Am Not an Animal! Persons, Human and Divine (V. Inwagen & D. Zimmerman, Eds.). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Inwagen, P. V. (1978). The Possibility of Resurrection. International Journal of Philosophy of Religion, 9(2), pp. 114-121.
Legenhausen, G. (1989). Moderate Anti-Haecceitism. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 49(4), pp. 625-642.
Martin, R. & Barresi, J. (2006). The Rise and Fall of Soul and Self. New York: Columbia University Press.
Merricks, T. (2007). The Word Made Flesh: Dualism, Physicalism, and the Incarnation. (P. V. Inwagen & D. Zimmerman, Eds.). Persons, Human and Divine. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Murphy, N. (2006). Bodies and Souls, or Spirited Bodies? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Murphy, N. (2006). Bodies and Souls, or Spirited Bodies? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 112ff.
Murphy, Nancey. (2009). Divine Action in the Natural Order: Buridan’s Ass and Schrödinger’s Cat (F. L. Shults, N. Murphy, & R. J. Russell, Eds.). Philosophy, science, and divine action. Leiden: Brill.
Papineau, D. (2002). Thinking About Consciousness. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Schaff, P. (2006). The Ante-Nicene Fathers (Vol. 3). Latin Christianity: Its Founder, Tertullian, Grand Rapids, MI: Christian Classics Ethereal Library.
Snowden, P. F. (1990). Persons, Animals, and Ourselves. The Person and the Human Mind, (Christopher Gill, Ed.). Oxford: Clarenden Press.
Swoyer, C., & Orilia, F. (1999). Properties.
Taliaferro, C. (1994). Consciousness and the Mind of God, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Taliaferro, C., & Goetz, S. (2008). The prospect of Christian materialism. Christian Scholar's Review, 37(3), 303.
Taliaferro, C. (1990). Philosophy of Mind and the Christian. Christian Theism and the Problems of Philosophy (M. D. Beaty, Ed.). Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
(1885). A Treatise on the Soul (P. Holmes, Trans.). from Ante-Nicene Fathers (A. Roberts, J. Donaldson, & A. C, Coxe, Eds., Vol. 3). NY: Christian Literature Publishing Co.
Thomson, A. (2008). Bodies of Thought: Science, Religion, and the Soul in the Early Enlightenment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ware, K. (1999). The Soul in Greek Christianity (M. James C. Craabe, ed.). From Soul to Self. London and New York: Routledge.
Zimmerman, D. (2002). Divine Action and Modern Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Zimmerman, D. (2004). Reply to Baker. Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Religion (M. L. Peterson & R. J. VanArragon, Eds.). Malden: Blackwell.
Legenhausen, G. C. (. (2021). Should Christians or Muslims Be Dualists? A Critical Review of Two Articles. Theosophia Islamica, 1(2), 75-104. doi: 10.22081/jti.2021.72372
MLA
Legenhausen, G. C. (. . "Should Christians or Muslims Be Dualists? A Critical Review of Two Articles", Theosophia Islamica, 1, 2, 2021, 75-104. doi: 10.22081/jti.2021.72372
HARVARD
Legenhausen, G. C. (. (2021). 'Should Christians or Muslims Be Dualists? A Critical Review of Two Articles', Theosophia Islamica, 1(2), pp. 75-104. doi: 10.22081/jti.2021.72372
CHICAGO
G. C. (. Legenhausen, "Should Christians or Muslims Be Dualists? A Critical Review of Two Articles," Theosophia Islamica, 1 2 (2021): 75-104, doi: 10.22081/jti.2021.72372
VANCOUVER
Legenhausen, G. C. (. Should Christians or Muslims Be Dualists? A Critical Review of Two Articles. Theosophia Islamica, 2021; 1(2): 75-104. doi: 10.22081/jti.2021.72372