The Explanation of the Relationship between Religion and Philosophy Based on Concreteness of Absolute Spirit in The Phenomenology of Spirit

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 PhD of Philosophy, Department of Philosophy,Faculty of Literature, Tabriz, Iran.

2 MA of Islamic Philosophy and Theology, Minor: Studying Shia

10.22081/jti.2022.75518

Abstract

According to The Phenomenology of Spirit, the religion and philosophy are considered as important stages of the history of consciousness, and the absolute spirit is to become self-conscious of itself, as spirit, in the process of genesis of these two stages. The central issue of the present article is answering the following questions: “What relationship does Hegel establish between delicacies of religion and philosophy?” “Are religion and philosophy considered, in his thought, as double truths for each of which separate realms exist or these two are different stages of one single truth that express the spirit’s self-consciousness of itself in two stages?” To answer these questions, the writer attempts to show, through a descriptive-analytical method, how Hegel offers a theoretical explanation for substituting the image of national and ethnic religion for its traditional image by making the absolute affair to the ethnic spirit. Besides, it shows how Hegel – unlike the transcendental philosophy and exalted philosophy – on the one hand turns God and absolute spirit from non-understandable ideas to cognitive and conceptual ones, and on the other hand, removes – in this way – the duality of the realm between religion and philosophy and establishes an internal relationship between them. Through creating a dialectic relationship between religion and philosophy, he finds the possibility to remove the contrast between the myth and the realm of systematic knowledge. And by making it close to the framework of system of knowledge, he introduces the myth not in contrast to rational knowledge, but as the outset of the way whose truth the rational knowledge is going to explain.

Keywords

References

  1. Adorno, T. and Horkheimer, M. (2002). Dialectic of Enlightenment: Philosophical Fragments (Trans: Farhadpur, M. and Mehrgan, O.) 1st, Tehran: Gam Now.
  2. Beiser, F. (2005). Hegel (Trans: Hosseini, M.). Tehran: Qoqnus (3rd)
  3. Cassirer, E. (1932). Die Philosophie der Aufklarung (Trans: Mouqen, Y.). Tehran: Niloofar.
  4. Desmond, W. (2003). “Ashgate Studies in the History of Philosophical Theology” in Hegel’s God a Counterfeit Double. Routledge
  5. Franco, C. (2009). Hegel s Phenomenology of Spirit. (ed. Kenneth R. Westphal), West Sussex: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
  6. Hegel, G. W. F. (1807). Phanomenologie des Geistes (Trans: Hosseini, M. and Ardabili, M. M.). Tehran: Ney.
  7. Hegel, G. W. F. (1817). Enzyklopadie der Philosophischen Wissenschaften im Grundrisse (Trans: Jebelli, Z.). Tehran: Shafi‘i.
  8. Hegel, G. W. F. (1895). “Lectures on the Philosophy of Religion, Together With a Work on the Proofs of the Existence of God”, Vol. I., E. B. Speirs, B. D., and J. Burdon Sanderson, Ballantyne, London: Hanson and Co., at Ballantyne Press.
  9. Hegel, G. W. F. (1907). Der Geist des Christentums und Sein Schicksal (Trans. Jebelli, Z.). Tehran: Shafi‘i.
  10. Hegel, G. W. F. (1977), Faith & Knowledge (Trans: Cerf, W. and Harris, H. S.), State University of New York Press.
  11. Hegel, G. W. F. (1984). “Lectures on the Philosophy of Religion”, Vol. 1, in Introduction and Concept of Religion, (ed. Peter C. Hodgson), Oxford: Oxford University Press
  12. Houlgate, S. (2013). Hegel's phenomenology of spirit. New York: Bloomsbury Publishing Plc.
  13. Hyppolite, J. (1974). Genesis and Structure of Hegel's phenomenology. (Trans: S. Cherniak, & J. Heckman) Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
  14. Kain, P. j. 2005. Hegel and the Other: A Study of the Phenomenology of Spirit. New York: State University of New York Press.
  15. Kant, I. (1785). Grundlegung Zur Metaphysik der Sitten (Trans: ‘Inayat, H.). Tehran: Kharazmi.
  16. Kant, I. (2004). Critique of Practical Reason (Tras: Rahmati, I.). Tehran: Nur al-Thaqalayn.
  17. Kant, I. (2004). Kritik der Praktischen Vernunft = Critique of Practical Reason (Trans: Rahmati, I.). Tehran: Nur al-Thaqalayn.
  18. Kojeve, A. (1980). INTRODUCTION TO THE READING OF Hegel (LECTURES ON THE Phenomenology of Spirit), Cornell University Press ITHACA AND LONDON.
  19. Lukacs, G. (1977). The Young Hegel: Studies in the Relations between Dialectics and Economics (Trans: Hakimi, M.). Tehran: Markaz.
  20. Pasternack Lawrence, R. (2013). Routledge Philosophy Guidebook to Kant on Religion within the Boundaries of Mere Reason, Routledge, Series: Routledge Philosophy GuideBooks,
  21. Pinkard, T. (2002). German Philosophy 1760-1860 (Trans: Qatruie, N.). Tehran: Qoqnus.
  22. Plamenatz, J. (1963). Man and Society: a Critical Examination of Some Important Social Theories from Machiavelli to Marx (Chapters 3 and 4) (Bashiriya, H.). Tehran: Ney.
  23. Ruckmore, T. (1997) An Introduction to Hegel's Phenomenology of Spirit. Berkley. Los Angeles: University of California Press.
  24. Siep, L. (2014), Hegel's Phenomenology of Spirit, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  25. Stern, R. (1990). Hegel, Kant and the Structure of the Object (Trans: Ardabili, M. M. and Mohammadi Asal, M.). Tehran: Qoqnus.
  26. Stern, R. (2002). Routledge Philosophy Guidebook to Hegel and the Phenomenology of Spirit (Trans: Ardabili, M. M. and Sayyedi, S. J.). Tehran: Qoqnus.
  27. Znoj, M. (1990). Mlady Hegel Naprahu Moderny (‘Ibadian, M.). Tehran: Agah.
Theosophia Islamica
Volume 2, Issue 2
August 2022
Pages 32-59

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics